Anti-monarchist left 'very cold' as Prince Harry refuses to give up Duke of Sussex title

Date:

Share post:

[ad_1]

The BBC’s political flagship programme Question Time was filmed in Birmingham where an audience member questioned the panel about the impact of the book on the monarchy. The panel was made up of defence minister Alex Chalk MP, Labour’s Bridget Phillipson, former politician and practicing barrister Anna Soubry, journalist Ash Sarkar, and historian and author Tim Stanley.

The panel discussed the question: ‘Have the allegations in Prince Harry’s book damaged the royal family?’

Mr Stanley denied that the monarchy has been damaged, an opinion which has been supported by a recent YouGov survey about the popularity of the royals versus that of the Sussexes.

The first survey following the release of the book concluded that the King and Prince William have gained favourability with the public while Harry’s popularity has plummeted to its lowest level ever.

Mr Stanley accused the 38-year-old prince of “perversely” wanting to return to the monarchy, despite his harsh criticisms of the institution.

The commentator said: “Perversely, he wants to come back. He called the family hierarchical. It’s a monarchy, hello? Of course, it is hierarchical.

“This is the strange thing. Harry attacks individuals within the institution, but when asked if he still supports the monarchy, he does.”

Much of the criticism launched at the duke has been around his double standards of behaviour for him compared to that of the royals and the press.

Left-wing journalist and activist Ash Sarkar voiced her anger at the Sussexes’ refusal to relinquish their titles amid their attacks on the Firm.

Ms Sarkar, a self-proclaimed Republican, told the panel: “I think he should give up his titles. That is what leaves me cold.

READ MORE: Queen Elizabeth II lauded amid release of Prince Harry’s Megxit memoir

This act was last used to remove the UK titles from German members of the Royal Family during the First World War.

Mr Stanley concluded that the book has not caused any damage to the monarchy, which as an institution has seen many of these dramas before.

He said: “In a better age, Harry and William would have resolved this with pistols at dawn, but now it is done through Netflix.

“But the monarchy survives because its significant does not rest on the individuals within it, but upon its constitutional role.”



[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img

Related articles

Selena Gomez, 30, says ‘I’m a little big’ as she hits back at Golden Globe outfit trolls

Selena, 30, hit back at online trolls who wrote nasty comments about her weight, despite oozing confidence...

Dancing On Ice’s Ekin-Su details ‘supportive’ gestures from partner Davide

“It's great, I’m happy I’m doing it, no regrets at all, see you later to the curse!”Ekin...

Kate wore stunning full length gown with a trendy twist – shows off her enviable legs

The royal turned heads in a silver chain with lots of geometric shapes attached to it, and...

Nick Kyrgios risks trouble with Aussie police after scooter ride before Australian Open

Nick Kyrgios could find himself in hot water ahead of the Australian Open after he was pictured riding an e-scooter...